PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 43.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 11.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '21 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 355 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
75.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 246 246 245 242 246 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 572 612 615 460 409 MB/s
|
128%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
554GB free
Firmware: 6A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 124 123 127 125 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
723GB free
Firmware: 6A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 126 126 127 125 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
905GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 73 73 73 64 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
461GB free
Firmware: 6A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 124 126 126 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
33% | 12% | 59 | 340 | 279 | 60 | 42.5" | 2194 1234 | ACR0558 Acer ET430K |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 87x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |