Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR G770 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER NLAI 001
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '21 at 01:47
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 126 57% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 389 39% 320 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Quanta(152D 1244) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 47.3 Parallax 5.2 4% 19.3 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 8.4 6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB 4,923 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 121 130 145 151 139 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.2% Average	Read 54.4 Write 116 Mixed 159 SusWrite 133 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 26.1 98% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 153 120% 170 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 1x8GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 15.5 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	11%	18	27	7	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE0700

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	713x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	631x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	536x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	737x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	351x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	646x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	376x
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples	323x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 1,443 samples	469x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	255x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 45%, 941 samples	196x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16