Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 07:15
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 136
56% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 392
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 82.7
51% 68.3 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 44.4
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDB NCE0010PNC 1TB
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 350 354 358 358 358 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 361
Write 352
Mixed 282
SusWrite 350
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 36.3
114% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 191
151% 211 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 108%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$29
1.5TB free
Firmware: 00.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 134
Write 41.7
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 40.4
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINGBOX-1600 00LF KINGBOX-1600 00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 8% 65 280 184 75 29.5" 2560 1080 SPT0C0D C305W-2560UN
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 11: 0R 3G 2B | Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 15: 0R 5G 0B | Score 7: 0R 1G 4B
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback