Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FA_X712FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FA_X712FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712FA
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 00:07
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 92%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 28.1
19% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 48.7
8-Core 56.2
7% 52.5 Pts
64-Core 74.3
5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1741) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 213 213 211 215 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 366
Write 248
Mixed 247
SusWrite 215
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 16.1
49% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 96.8
72% 96 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 111%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
462GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 609 672 553 560 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 678
Write 879
Mixed 851
SusWrite 602
170% 752 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 23.5
72% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 94.1
DQ Mixed 105
78% 102 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 24GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1745
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FA_X712FA Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FA_X712FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback