Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 05:48
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 40.5 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 122 40% 72.2 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 231 26% 204 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 4.5 3% 26.3 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 471 718 631 440 547 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 882 Write 866 Mixed 894 SusWrite 601 183% 811 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 28.4 93% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 429 DQ Write 370 DQ Mixed 397 298% 399 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 181%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 775GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 135 135 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 149 Write 137 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 131 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 CT8G4SFS6266.M4FE 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.4% Average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 16.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 12: 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
12%	7%	84	181	92	120	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0036

History: Score 17: 1R 3G 3B | Score 12: 1R 1G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	492x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	300x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16