Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 06:04
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 77.3 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 761 74% 609 Pts	64-Core 935 58% 935 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PwrHis(1787 D570) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 54.6 Reflection 56.5 Parallax 70.2 44% 60.4 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 54.7 Splatting 38.9 40% 50.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S320-1T 1TB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 894GB free (System drive) Firmware: V838175 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 389 390 337 54 48 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 431 Write 379 Mixed 351 SusWrite 267 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 22.1 107% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 184 138% 180 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 88%
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 76GB free Firmware: P1222A SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 85 79 71 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 509 Write 407 Mixed 175 SusWrite 75 64% 292 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 0.6 39% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 88.1 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 21.7 30% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
KLEVV IM44GU48N24-FFFHA0 Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 29 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 32.7 SC Mixed 26.7 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 29: 3R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	36%	36	9	7	60	23.8"	1920 1080	IOD180E LCD-MF244ED

History: Score 28: 2R 3G 9B | Score 29: 3R 2G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	601x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	153x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	112x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	77x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16