Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100503
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 21:06
Run Duration	491 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 140 58% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 351 37% 294 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.9% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 69.3 59% 71.5 fps	MRender 62.4 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 56.9 50% 61.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB 14,793 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 37 59 56 19 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 292 Write 187 Mixed 198 SusWrite 55.2 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 21.2 76% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 11.2 DQ Write 52.8 DQ Mixed 32.7 25% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 93%
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB 14,793 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 73GB free Firmware: SAFM13.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 80 77 57 54 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 287 Write 186 Mixed 193 SusWrite 66.4 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 24.4 81% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.3 DQ Write 30.7 DQ Mixed 2.3 9% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 93%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 480GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 93 89 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 101 Write 84.9 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 89.9 59% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 61%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 90 98 94 101 101 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 148 Write 133 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 93.2 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 87%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 93 90 95 94 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 156 Write 149 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 89.9 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 141GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 90 98 94 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 114 Write 125 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 93.2 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 100%
TOSHIBA MK1633GSG 160GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 79GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.1% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 36.5 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 40.6 49% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.8 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 7R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	48%	25	319	251	60	34.1"	2560 1080	GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD4P Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	41x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	22x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	11x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	23x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	22x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16