Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 04:49
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 6-Core 742 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 73.6 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 789 82% 658 Pts	64-Core 993 61% 993 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3792) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Lighting 97.8 Reflection 93.6 Parallax 81.1 80% 90.8 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 83 Splatting 74.9 62% 75 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.7.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 118 137 120 130 129 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.5% Below average	Read 6.2 Write 46 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 133 11% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 16.4 29% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 56.3 107% 212 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 80%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 61GB free Firmware: 1AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 125 Write 46.3 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 114 66% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.3 230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX426C13/16G 2x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	74.8% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 29.1 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 28.9 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	30	26"	1280 720	XXX0000 AAA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	601x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	153x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	112x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	77x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16