Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 13:55
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 69.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 216 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 664 65% 532 Pts	64-Core 1,244 77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 510.10 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.4% Good	Lighting 83.9 Reflection 83.2 Parallax 77.4 68% 81.5 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 75.5 Splatting 68.1 66% 82 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 164 142 137 123 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 486 Write 461 Mixed 424 SusWrite 168 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 44.1 120% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: MJAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 34 34 33 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 132 Write 32.4 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 32.5 38% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.3% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 25.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	23.8"	1280 720	AUS24AF ASUS VP249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	412x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	193x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16