Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 07:59
Run Duration	480 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 142 2-Core 268 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 675 72% 572 Pts	64-Core 819 51% 819 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 93.7 Parallax 6.9 5% 35.5 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 122 129 128 132 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 613 Write 150 Mixed 199 SusWrite 128 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 33.8 140% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 160 128% 183 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 163%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 173GB free Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1066 903 922 937 925 567 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 1,354 Write 1,365 Mixed 1,270 SusWrite 887 274% 1,219 MB/s	4K Read 54 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 67.5 234% 81.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,136 DQ Write 632 DQ Mixed 629 536% 799 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 372%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 2TB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.5 7.8 8 8.1 6.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 53.4 Write 8.5 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 7.7 15% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 23.6 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 25.4 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
81%	28%	75	254	185	120	15.5"	1920 1080	BOE08FB

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	453x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	204x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16