MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 01:27
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Memory 51.3 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 206 62% 118 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 430 36% 309 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 04D2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.7% Above average	Lighting 67.6 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 92.8 55% 73.9 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 46.8 48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$60 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 256GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 390 386 348 309 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 344 Write 310 Mixed 300 SusWrite 342 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 35 96% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 334 252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 429GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 129 131 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 128 Write 122 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 131 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378A1K43BB2G3A141 CB8GU2400.C8ET 16GB 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 31.2 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 25.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 59: 8R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
59%	3%	746	230	65	144	23.8"	1920 1080	VSC0D39 XG2405

History: Score 43: 4R 5G 8B | Score 59: 8R 4G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	533x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	478x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	384x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	311x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	227x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	222x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	219x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	101x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16