Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210712
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180 43,966 User benchmarks, average bench 99% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 94.1 1-Core 177 2-Core 308 106% 193 Pts	4-Core 659 8-Core 979 102% 819 Pts	64-Core 1,124 70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60% Good	Lighting 77.7 Reflection 110 Parallax 83.6 63% 90.6 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 60.1 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 84 77 18 45 19 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 54.7 Write 176 Mixed 24 SusWrite 66.4 18% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 26.5 95% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 161 142% 210 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 32,187 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 40.1 MC Mixed 36.3 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 39.6 SC Mixed 30 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	144	23.5"	1280 720	MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $270Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	975x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	718x
Core i9-11900KIntel $265Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	448x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	377x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	343x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	332x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	273x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	246x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	199x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	111x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	104x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16