Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 13:59
Run Duration982 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$316
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 894
83% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,455
98% 1,455 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
MSI(1462 3896) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (165 fps cap detected)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 165
Parallax 165
133% 165 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 165
Splatting 163
133% 164 fps
Poor: 149%
This bench: 133%
Great: 227%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
330GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2033 735 609 624 624 624 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,367
Write 2,197
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 875
394% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 82.1
281% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 1,108
833% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 285%
Great: 320%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 79 124 84 108 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 84.9
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
98% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 38.3
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 38.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 53: 4R 7G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 46% 50 190 156 165 31.5" 2560 1440 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
History: Score 32: 3R 3G 8B | Score 55: 8R 2G 9B | Score 48: 5R 6G 5B | Score 73: 9R 7G 7B | Score 61: 8R 5G 6B | Score 74: 9R 8G 5B | Score 60: 6R 6G 12B | Score 56: 6R 6G 8B | Score 49: 6R 3G 10B | Score 63: 7R 6G 10B | Score 70: 7R 8G 11B | Score 54: 5R 7G 8B | Score 70: 8R 6G 12B | Score 63: 7R 6G 10B | Score 65: 8R 5G 10B | Score 66: 7R 7G 10B | Score 61: 7R 6G 8B | Score 58: 5R 8G 9B | Score 53: 4R 7G 12B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 25,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback