MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201207
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration	411 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3350G Vega Graphics 977 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 46.8 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 213 62% 119 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 604 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics 47,368 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 14.6 Parallax 28.6 16% 20.9 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 13.7 13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200918 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 258 82 70 48 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 403 Write 266 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 112 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 10 80% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 15.2 73% 162 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 93%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 27GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 99 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 96.8 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 98.6 55% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 17,908 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 24.4 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 22.4 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 60: 7R 7G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
60%	19%	96	162	114	60	21.5"	1920 1080	AOC2270 2270W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	300x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	220x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16