PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130408 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 03 '21 at 21:07 |
Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 863E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 286 323 355 387 359 MB/s
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$279
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 258 311 348 353 382 MB/s
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
222GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 95 169 70 52 50 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
24GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 70 62 67 70 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
59GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 71 68 71 76 75 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 9905471-079.A 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 144 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | AOC3201 Q32G1WG4 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 940x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 854x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 395x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 279x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 180x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 159x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |