Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 03:33
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$137 14,368 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 73.9 1-Core 152 2-Core 298 93% 175 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 714 82% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,126 70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 99%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 300 337 352 343 323 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 2,019 Write 918 Mixed 1,151 SusWrite 357 245% 1,111 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 65.6 220% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,102 DQ Write 954 DQ Mixed 1,007 760% 1,021 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 297%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 14GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 498 Write 432 Mixed 434 101% 455 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 52.3 174% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 194 146% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 161GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 109 114 122 116 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 104 Write 75.3 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 115 67% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 1x8GB 346 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.1% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	53	9	7	64	0"	2752 1152

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,333x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,054x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	880x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	399x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	382x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	206x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16