Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 18:31
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 752
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Asus(1043 8755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.2% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 73.8
62% 76.4 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 64.7
63% 79.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 379 377 381 367 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 420
Mixed 416
SusWrite 368
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 45.7
147% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
4GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 424
Mixed 359
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 44.2
146% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
32GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 75
Write 74.1
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 99.4
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 140 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 151
Write 152
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 142
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 148 153 152 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 102
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 150
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 22.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 20.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 4R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 20% 54 79 2 60 23.1" 2048 1152 DELD01D DELL SP2309W
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback