Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E410MA
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201224
Uptime	19.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '21 at 05:31
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 2,697 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 13.1 1-Core 60 2-Core 89.1 28% 54.1 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 196 28% 203 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 10E2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 2.4 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 204 151 147 143 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 804 Write 420 Mixed 588 SusWrite 174 110% 496 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 33.8 92% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 318 238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CTD 1x8GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 376 11% 376 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	4	60	13.9"	1280 720	AUO403D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	86x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	43x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	88x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	43x

SSD
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	24x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	16x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	15x

RAM
4ATF1264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicron_Bench 18%, 453 samples	68x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	42x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBSK_HynixBench 19%, 939 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16