Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '21 at 16:24
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 69.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 196 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 549 54% 441 Pts	64-Core 577 36% 577 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.5% Good	Lighting 82.8 Reflection 93.5 Parallax 81.2 68% 85.8 fps	MRender 98.8 Gravity 80.6 Splatting 73 68% 84.1 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB 7,253 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20140000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 426 435 416 402 409 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 750 Write 519 Mixed 678 SusWrite 442 134% 597 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 97.3 4K Mixed 55.1 184% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 60.9 53% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 204%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 296GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 9.1 9.1 8.9 8.9 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Read 5 Write 8.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 8.9 6% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.8% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 25.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 21.4 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 43: 5R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
43%	33%	45	309	248	120	23.6"	1920 1080	VTK0236 VIOTEK GN24CB

History: Score 25: 2R 3G 6B | Score 42: 6R 2G 6B | Score 43: 5R 4G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	53x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	47x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	45x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	12x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	41x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	29x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16