Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$200 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 72.3 1-Core 157 2-Core 313 95% 181 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 965 95% 775 Pts	64-Core 1,458 90% 1,458 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.1 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.5% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 67.3 36% 56.9 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 51.2 Splatting 43.3 41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 573GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 41 41 43 44 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 9.7 Write 10 Mixed 22 SusWrite 41.1 5% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 16.3 59% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 82.5 67% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 128%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 70GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 118 142 135 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 356 Write 186 Mixed 217 SusWrite 137 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 35 133% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 174 140% 200 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 83%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 118GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 327 328 327 324 326 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 476 Write 328 Mixed 283 SusWrite 326 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 25.3 100% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 78.1 DQ Mixed 124 95% 131 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 119 117 124 122 124 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 120 Write 123 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 118 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	63% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 24.2 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 23.7 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,332x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,054x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	879x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	398x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	382x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	205x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,208

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16