Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 94.3 51% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 190 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 79 77 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 408 Write 79.4 Mixed 130 SusWrite 78.3 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 40.3 145% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 81.7 DQ Mixed 90.8 69% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 70%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 363GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 182 178 171 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 181 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 176 100% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R334G1339U1S 1x4GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.2% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $195

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16