| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200811 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 13 '21 at 17:46 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G5920-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
53.4%
Above average
|
75% 136 Pts
|
26% 203 Pts
|
14% 224 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3723) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.1%
Very good
|
66% 96.2 fps
|
79% 95.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 132 125 125 129 132 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
44% 195 MB/s
|
94% 31.5 MB/s
|
40% 55.2 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.4 3.9 4.2 3.9 4 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
13% 13.5 MB/s
|
134% 2.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
46.5%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
44% 91.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H410M-HVS Builds (Compare 849 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 279x |
| Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 237x |
| Core i5-10400Intel $117Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 61x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 56x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $328 |