Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '21 at 18:11
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 121 2-Core 226 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 533 59% 467 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.6% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 48.6 Parallax 42.4 36% 45 fps	MRender 20.2 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 31.7 24% 28 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 246 261 261 248 254 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 1,113 Write 382 Mixed 358 SusWrite 277 117% 532 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 13.8 96% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 463 DQ Mixed 341 287% 415 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 236%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 142GB free Firmware: SAFM00.r SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 182 306 104 325 240 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 393 Write 383 Mixed 265 SusWrite 212 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 22.9 87% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 72.3 124% 241 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 111%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 264GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 265 136 72 78 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 406 Write 382 Mixed 318 SusWrite 139 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 34.3 110% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 352 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 121%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 85 85 84 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 63.3 Write 70.7 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 85.5 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.8% Very good	MC Read 34 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 23.3 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 15.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	995x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16