Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210820
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 74 1-Core 171 2-Core 337 102% 194 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 736 72% 590 Pts	64-Core 743 46% 743 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 113 Parallax 30.3 22% 56.7 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 21.4 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.3% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 88% 108 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 88.1 Splatting 80.5 78% 97.9 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 310GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 1092 411 261 127 186 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,262 Write 1,282 Mixed 1126 SusWrite 495 234% 1,041 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 57.5 188% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 872 DQ Write 391 DQ Mixed 885 589% 716 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 253%
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M81000G 1TB 629 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 238GB free Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 663 518 491 522 522 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 969 Write 1014 Mixed 371 SusWrite 485 159% 710 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 38 114% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 530 DQ Write 402 DQ Mixed 437 335% 456 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 314%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	67.9% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 20.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 16.6 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	4,179x
Core i5-11300HIntelBench 71%, 8,880 samples	1,476x
Gen Intel Core i9-12900HK12thBench 80%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	2,942x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	2,709x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	4x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	2,154x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	1,117x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	629x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 16GBMicronBench 68%, 4,476 samples	656x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 67%, 5,644 samples	591x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	555x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16