Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '17 at 15:04
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 672
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 195
Parallax 186
125% 178 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 174
Splatting 125
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 465
Write 448
Mixed 254
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 7.36
4K Write 8.18
4K Mixed 0.62
16% 5.39 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 8.58
DQ Mixed 0.68
3% 7.31 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 853%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 486
Mixed 507
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 31.3
109% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 145
155% 258 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
186GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,221
Write 1,454
Mixed 1,533
384% 1,736 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 31.9
122% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 401
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 182
191% 314 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 232%
Great: 283%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 164
Mixed 149
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.26
87% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 113%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 5TB
1TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
Read 119
Write 97.8
Mixed 103
134% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.24
70% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 41.1
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback