Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200429
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '21 at 23:38
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 78.5 1-Core 148 2-Core 298 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 855 91% 725 Pts	64-Core 1,041 64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22FC) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 104 0% 55.6 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 46.7 49% 62.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 97GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 149 150 149 149 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 493 Mixed 392 SusWrite 182 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 60.5 211% 75.1 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 362 275% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 594GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 49 43 33 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 111 Write 99.5 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 40.9 58% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 29.6 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 27.7 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,302x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	616x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	584x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	466x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	381x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	355x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	186x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	144x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	152x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	116x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $693

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16