New NTSI Contender E64 QC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemNew NTSI Contender E64 QC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P6TD DELUXE
Memory8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 635
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 43
Parallax 39.9
32% 40.6 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 28.8
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 61.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 27.7
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS724040KLSA80 400GB-$133
2GB free
Firmware: KFAOACCA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 28 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 26.1
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 27.8
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 32%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
51GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 31 29 21 18 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 32.6
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5x2GB
5 of 6 slots used
10GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NTSI Contender E64 QC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: New NTSI Contender E64 QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,049
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback