Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190313
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '21 at 19:53
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 82.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 255 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 719 80% 629 Pts	64-Core 716 44% 716 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3793) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 91.4 Reflection 89.4 Parallax 78.3 74% 86.4 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 79.9 Splatting 72.5 59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 95 95 91 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 286 Write 121 Mixed 170 SusWrite 92.3 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 26.2 99% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.5 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 104 78% 104 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 75%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 256GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1336 1046 869 869 887 851 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 1,989 Write 1,736 Mixed 1502 SusWrite 976 347% 1,551 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 65.9 219% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,666 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 1,235 820% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 355%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 168 168 170 170 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 160 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 166 93% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.4% Below average	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	200x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	156x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	130x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	74x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	58x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	44x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	107x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	46x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $761

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16