Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 175
61% 110 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 450
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 140
Parallax 135
112% 138 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 101
Splatting 110
101% 126 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1015 816 683 380 290 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1113
Write 1,453
Mixed 1,148
SusWrite 582
242% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 41.1
135% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 855
639% 849 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 160%
Great: 269%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$279
837GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 274 159 120 152 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 480
Write 255
Mixed 367
SusWrite 211
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 41.9
136% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 204
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 128%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
55GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1357 392 333 544 548 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 555
Mixed 547
SusWrite 622
147% 660 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 32.6
119% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 1011
602% 616 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 130%
Great: 277%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 24 23 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 66.2
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 25.4
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
165% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 46 45 45 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 51.9
Write 39.6
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 45.7
57% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 26.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $597
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback