Medion ERAZER X5384 F/C128

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5384 F/C128 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160125
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '17 at 23:00
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 111 2-Core 214 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 669 63% 524 Pts	64-Core 660 41% 660 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.3% Good	Lighting 78.1 Reflection 81.8 Parallax 72.1 64% 77.4 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 65.6 57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2776 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 924 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 120 (AE) Unknown 99 99 6 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1558 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 52 42 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 94 94 15770582 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33642 (F2) Unknown 99 99 9045 (F9) Unknown 99 99 61456	72.2% Very good	Read 512 Write 91 Mixed 153 54% 252 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 27.2 122% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 67.4 88% 166 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 119%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 216 180 4166 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1726 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2769 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 891 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16766 (C2) HDA temperature 114 107 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	81.5% Excellent	Read 139 Write 145 Mixed 132 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.29 113% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.5% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 25.7 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 21.6 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16