Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161027
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '21 at 02:22
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$140 174,158 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 87 2-Core 168 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 317 43% 314 Pts	64-Core 319 21% 319 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230 209,463 User benchmarks, average bench 69% PNY(196E 1332) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2209 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73% Very good	Lighting 95.5 Reflection 93.3 Parallax 80.5 77% 89.8 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 86.8 Splatting 76.5 68% 78.5 fps
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 849,566 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 434 Write 377 Mixed 352 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 88.8 4K Mixed 49.5 165% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 328 248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,028,323 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 61GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 114 116 112 117 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 113 Write 104 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 113 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 12,989 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.7% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 17.6 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 44: 5R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
44%	14%	103	99	5	60	31.5"	1280 720	TCL0000 32S321

History: Score 47: 6R 3G 8B | Score 44: 5R 5G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $125Bench 64%, 103,228 samples	96x
Core i5-6500Intel $210Bench 72%, 221,872 samples	86x
Core i5-6400Intel $140Bench 69%, 174,158 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples	56x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 870,997 samples	52x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $230Bench 53%, 571,815 samples	49x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 104%, 849,566 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 106%, 758,178 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 594,660 samples	26x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 42,535 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $72Bench 83%, 540,354 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 598,699 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $582

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334	Nvidia RTX 3050 $250	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16