Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 22:11
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 134
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 440
39% 330 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 75.8
63% 78.6 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 74.8
61% 74.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 60%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 45.6
33% 44.2 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 31.5
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 480GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 58 44 46 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 587
Write 62.1
Mixed 380
SusWrite 58.4
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 17.2
63% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 54.4
49% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 121%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 136 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 135
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
878GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 81 79 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 80.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 80.1
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 14.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback