Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '22 at 16:58
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 72.1 1-Core 142 2-Core 277 88% 163 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 885 83% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,348 83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 0428) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.8% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 46 27% 36.7 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 21.5 23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 28 6.1 72 57 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 486 Write 440 Mixed 422 SusWrite 99.4 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 1.2 60% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 14 DQ Mixed 0.5 30% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 320GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 94 95 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 98.3 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 93.9 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 683GB free Firmware: MKAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 134 134 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 133 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 54,651 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.6% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 28.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 26.1 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	157x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	106x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	105x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	221x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	218x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $449

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16