Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '22 at 11:47
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 89.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 215 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 834 82% 669 Pts	64-Core 1,071 66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 61.1 Parallax 56.9 49% 59.3 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 56 49% 61 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T1R0A-68A4W0 2TB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 411000WR SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 444 440 472 473 476 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 463 Mixed 363 SusWrite 462 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 50.2 180% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 224 199% 302 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 122%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$89 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 577GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 483 480 484 478 481 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 457 Mixed 422 SusWrite 482 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 67.1 223% 78 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 137%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 184 185 182 194 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 192 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 187 107% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB 17,710 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 26.8 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 37.7 SC Mixed 27.1 80% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,032

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16