Performance Results


Gaming 149% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 153% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '22 at 01:40
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$427 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 144 2-Core 287 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 1,032 91% 772 Pts	64-Core 1,566 97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	155% Outstanding	Lighting 209 Reflection 198 Parallax 229 170% 212 fps	MRender 255 Gravity 208 Splatting 165 167% 210 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 401 417 401 399 394 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 2,010 Write 766 Mixed 540 SusWrite 410 204% 931 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 52.6 196% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,087 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 355 341% 562 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 243%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 17,176 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 72GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 263 191 189 185 211 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 966 Write 598 Mixed 528 SusWrite 246 130% 585 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 48.1 163% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 461 DQ Write 512 DQ Mixed 370 311% 448 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 372%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 9,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 162 162 159 163 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 9,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 166 170 177 166 171 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB 17,500 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 29.5 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 45.4 SC Mixed 30.8 94% 33 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,073x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	680x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	309x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	412x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	320x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	264x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,584

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16