Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6157U 479 User benchmarks, average bench 54% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 127 50% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 197 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550 819 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(1C6C 0001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	9.09% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 12.7 9% 11.1 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 10.5 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.09% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JUMPER 256GB 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEA2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 169 159 164 161 159 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.4% Above average	Read 353 Write 196 Mixed 190 SusWrite 185 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 11.8 53% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 176 159% 239 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.4% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16