Asrock X570 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210802
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '22 at 12:39
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 70.7 1-Core 145 2-Core 283 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 854 83% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,398 86% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Lighting 93.9 Reflection 92.5 Parallax 86.5 76% 91 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 81.4 Splatting 73.3 71% 89.2 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 316GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 583 607 584 578 567 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,282 Write 722 Mixed 473 SusWrite 589 222% 1,017 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 48.7 196% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 644 DQ Mixed 743 565% 768 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 340%
Mushkin MKNSSDRE512GB-LT 512GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 105GB free Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 387 421 414 416 413 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 349 Mixed 289 SusWrite 410 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 35.5 125% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 157 126% 178 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 92%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 599GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 397 427 421 432 412 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 418 Mixed 394 SusWrite 418 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 43.1 139% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 183 143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 110GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 270 272 273 274 274 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 407 Mixed 356 SusWrite 286 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 44.1 152% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 158 130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 118%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 931GB free Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1535 811 802 836 822 781 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,452 Write 1,806 Mixed 1,398 SusWrite 931 315% 1,397 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 69.1 228% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 950 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 821 608% 809 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 276%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 546GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 102 102 101 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	58% Above average	Read 100 Write 95.6 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 101 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 74%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 123 123 121 128 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 125 Write 136 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 125 162% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.3 216% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 13,446 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.2% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 26.2 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 24.6 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Pro4 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	141x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	121x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	97x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	61x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	59x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	53x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	33x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	31x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	19x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $553

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16