| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus B75M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130217 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '22 at 17:39 |
| Run Duration | 230 Seconds |
| Run User | MDA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.7%
Above average
|
60% 100 Pts
|
28% 211 Pts
|
12% 197 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.1%
Above average
|
50% 64.5 fps
|
53% 64.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 171 147 87 85 84 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
47% 210 MB/s
|
100% 32.8 MB/s
|
148% 198 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
594GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 81 80 86 82 82 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
55% 75.6 MB/s
|
190% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
6GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 57 57 56 58 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
25% 34.5 MB/s
|
100% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.3%
Average
|
40% 13.8 GB/s
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
43% 93.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 619 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 108x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 88x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 53x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 76x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 37x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $435 |