HP 23-q107a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 23-q107a (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B42
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150714
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '22 at 11:11
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca) 12,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 51.5 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 58 31% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 87.8 8-Core 88.2 12% 88 Pts	64-Core 87.6 5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2B42) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.44.02 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 3.3 3% 3.53 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 850GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 50 80 66 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 110 Write 34.1 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 77.3 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 18 12 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 28.1 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 17 19% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 8.5 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.63% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 22 Mixed 20 SusWrite 12.1 26% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.63% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 685GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 116 93 100 72 116 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 113 Write 127 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 100 118% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 16GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 23-q107a

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)