Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D PREMIUM (all builds)
Memory	15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 15:16
Run Duration	479 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 171 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 529 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.4% Very good	Lighting 77 Reflection 116 Parallax 114 63% 103 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 108 Splatting 104 85% 104 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 514GB free (System drive) Firmware: DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 30139 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 43 (B1) Unknown 98 98 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 12 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28698461728	33.4% Below average	Read 263 Write 114 Mixed 143 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 1.61 60% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 197GB free Firmware: EXT0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 468 Write 326 Mixed 311 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 25.8 118% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 79.5 96% 170 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 126%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 558GB free Firmware: MKAO Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 166 Write 104 Mixed 99.7 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.33 106% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 87%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 327GB free Firmware: MJAO Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 113 Write 109 Mixed 96.2 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 92%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB 3,876 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 306GB free Firmware: 0K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 220 3766 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 115 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 14 14 62946 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 91 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 97 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.7% Above average	Read 104 Write 83 Mixed 97.7 72% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.39 116% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 73%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB 3,876 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 109GB free Firmware: 0K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 223 3691 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 167 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 14 14 62839 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 91 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 149 (C2) HDA temperature 110 100 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.9% Below average	Read 69.9 Write 68.6 Mixed 72 53% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.55 139% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 73%
ST6000DX 000-1H217Z 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 25% Great: 45%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 88.1 Write 108 Mixed 98.6 130% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.21 57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 89GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 73.3 Write 97.6 Mixed 8.45 73% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.28 61% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 37%
hp v165w 4GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 5307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	4.75% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 4.81 Mixed 7.5 11% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.81 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 15% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.75% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 16.3 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D PREMIUM Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	134x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	95x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	19x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	17x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	140x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	114x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16