Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 580
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.7% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 74.7
44% 62.3 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 43.7
44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bt58ssd0 9S 240GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 137 62 4.3 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 315
Write 127
Mixed 183
SusWrite 45.6
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 75.7
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
12% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $591
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback