| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Wortmann_ag 1001295;2110087 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME B360M-A |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190724 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | May 14 '22 at 20:28 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.4%
Excellent
|
82% 144 Pts
|
61% 470 Pts
|
34% 547 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
29% 37.3 fps
|
26% 33.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 29 6.8 1.5 61 110 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
58% 263 MB/s
|
62% 19 MB/s
|
36% 63.4 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 215 215 213 211 213 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
113% 156 MB/s
|
158% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.9%
Above average
|
57% 20.1 GB/s
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
60% 67.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 1001295;2110087 Builds (Compare 14 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Wortmann_ag 1001295;2110087
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 13x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $203 |