PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5B (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090309 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 08 '17 at 22:45 |
Run Duration | 1018 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
31.6%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Maxtor 6L200P0 204GB
29GB free
Firmware: AB4H Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
7.15%
Terrible
|
||||
32%
Below average
|
||||
51.4%
Above average
|
||||
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
674GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate USB 640GB
14GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic External 1TB
11GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
11GB free, PID 101a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
13.2%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 27x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 19x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $195 |