Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 186 26% 189 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sony(104D 907B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.0.0.0 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.94% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 4.3 4% 5 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.94% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshib THNSNC128GMMJ 128GB 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJSA SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 179 187 186 186 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.8% Below average	Read 194 Write 165 Mixed 110 SusWrite 182 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 19.3 62% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 27.3 23% 32.2 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	3x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6630MAMDBench 5%, 2,501 samples	1x

SSD
THNSNC128GMMJ 128GBToshibaBench 66%, 1 sample	2x
THNSNC128GMMJ 128GBToshibBench 40%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16