DEXP Mars E262

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	DEXP Mars E262 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star H310M PRO-VD PLUS
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 725 74% 596 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 60.1 Parallax 50.8 47% 56.1 fps	MRender 44.3 Gravity 53.5 Splatting 48.9 40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 3,975 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 45 58 53 32 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 422 Write 284 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 71.7 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 19.2 42% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 55.3 DQ Mixed 105 64% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 580GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 163 140 155 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 172 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 162 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2400 04CB 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 21.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 22.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Mars E262 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: DEXP Mars E262

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	3x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
GKE800UD102408-2400 04CB 16GBUnknownBench 73%, 9 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16