Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 120
57% 90 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 323
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 29.4
23% 28.9 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 19.1
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 10 2.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 3,866
Write 33.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 12.1
207% 994 MB/s
4K Read 449
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 4.4
688% 152 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 337%
Great: 337%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
325GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 9.5 9.7 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4S7S8MB-4 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback