Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 00:15
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3820-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 127
54% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 366
40% 311 Pts
64-Core 465
31% 465 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 19.3
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11.8
13% 14 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$103
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 411 428 366 325 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 350
Write 302
Mixed 265
SusWrite 386
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 33.2
93% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 289
235% 333 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 138%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$103
823GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 440 442 397 347 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 319
Write 314
Mixed 283
SusWrite 414
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 23.1
63% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 299
211% 268 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston K66GKY-ETB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 32.7
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 22: 3R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 10% 58 50 30 60 27.5" 1360 768 VIZ0095 E280-B1
Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $478
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $292Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3070 $536Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $62SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback