Amazon g5.2xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmazon g5.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 00:49
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7R32
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 516
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10G
Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 245
Parallax 283
241% 275 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 232
Splatting 165
169% 213 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 194%
Great: 193%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 4.5TB
391GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 144 141 143 142 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
Read 626
Write 272
Mixed 420
SusWrite 144
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 12.5
51% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 78.1
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 65
50% 69.3 MB/s
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 138 137 136 136 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
Read 625
Write 251
Mixed 425
SusWrite 141
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 13.5
48% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 78.1
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 65.4
51% 69.4 MB/s
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 136 137 138 139 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 41.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 31.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g5.2xlarge Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

System: Amazon g5.2xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback