Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 20:11
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 514
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 49.1
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 62.2
40% 49.3 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 25.3
29% 36 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C100 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 68 69 71 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 148
Write 210
Mixed 112
SusWrite 66.6
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 18.7
74% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 22.3
24% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 83%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 122 103 127 110 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 207
Write 213
Mixed 183
SusWrite 121
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 28.9
95% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 32.7
32% 48 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 111%
Emtec X300 1TB
945GB free
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 715 340 340 354 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 528
206% 913 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 42.6
141% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 457
335% 443 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 299%
Seagate ST31000525SV 1TB-$155
8GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 102
Write 37.9
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 71.1
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
17GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 76 73 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 68.9
Write 39.5
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 74.3
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 58%
Intenso Slim Line 32GB
25GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 16 16 16 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 19.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 14.4
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
102% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback