| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190717 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 18 '22 at 19:09 |
| Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
| Run User | PRI-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
60.2%
Good
|
55% 91.4 Pts
|
37% 286 Pts
|
32% 518 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51%
Above average
|
52% 71.9 fps
|
50% 62.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NE-512 512GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 253 152 195 83 747 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
116% 528 MB/s
|
107% 37.8 MB/s
|
125% 216 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38
572GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 119 129 128 129 MB/s
|
68.9%
Good
|
70% 95.5 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB
3GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.6 MB/s
|
5.64%
Terrible
|
12% 10.2 MB/s
|
20% 1.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
107% 37.5 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
44% 89.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,966 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 504x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 215x |
| Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 140x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 112x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 89x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |